Justice :: The Severe Consequences Of Domestic Violence

The fact that domestic violence causes physical injuries, dysfunctional families, and broken relationships is well known. However, unless you have been paying halt attention to the accurate developments related to this topic, you are probably unaware that there has been a radical change in the diagram our upright system deals with domestic violence.

Ever since our society’s attitude toward domestic violence began to change, numerous laws have been enacted every year that specifically address domestic violence within our location and our federal statutes. As a result, the consequences of committing or being accused of committing domestic violence are also growing. The following list illustrates some of the severe consequences associated with domestic violence cases:

1) Enhanced jail or prison time, fines, the completion of a fifty-two week batterer’s treatment class, and the issuance of a criminal protective order.

Our criminal justice system now deals with domestic violence as a new offense. Domestic violence is no longer treated as a simple battery. Consequently, our system imposes enhanced and specialized sentences for these offenses.

2) The loss of employment opportunities.

One of the most serious consequences of domestic violence is the stigma that is attached to these crimes. With a conviction of domestic violence on one’s relate, it can be very difficult to acquire employment in determined types of occupations, especially jobs within government.

3) The denial or revocation of a position license to exclusive in a particular type of business.

An allegation of having committed domestic violence can also obtain it difficult for a person to secure or have a spot issued license, such as a license to sell disaster estate or a license to work in or operate a care facility.

4) The issuance of a criminal and/or family law restraining order.

Restraining orders are issued by criminal and family courts routinely where there are allegations of domestic violence. An sure consequence to these orders is the loss of liberty, to the extent the order forbids the restrained party from going to sure locations.

5) The loss of the honest to fill firearms.

When a restraining order is issued, it is automatic that the offender shall be restrained from owning or possessing a firearm. This restriction is particularly burdensome to people with occupations that require the possession of handguns.

6) The loss of immigration dwelling.

A conviction for domestic violence can result in the loss of a person’s immigration station. This loss of immigration area will occur, even if a person convinces the court to allow him or her to withdraw a plea of guilty upon successful completion of an infuriate management program.

7) An increase in the amount of spousal back paid.

The occurrence of domestic violence in a relationship is one of many factors the court must bid when ordering spousal attend. Consequently, a perpetrator of domestic violence is more likely to be ordered to pay additional spousal succor.

American Justice In The 1800’s

Lynch mobs, posses, noon showdowns…clearly, laws have changed considerably over the last two centuries. In the 19th century as the American frontier was expanding, many times there were simply not enough lawmen to enforce the laws, or people decided to unusual matters into their absorb hands. At any rate, the justice system of the 1800s had some necessary differences than the one of today, both formally and informally. Following are three examples of the different ways that justice was obtained, from civil means to downright barbaric acts, in the 19th century.

The lynching of Henry Smith – The lynch mobs of the 1800s provide one of the best examples chaotic and ruthless vigilante justice that has ever been shown. Barbaric by nature, these acts were often committed in the heat of the moment, when arouse levels were high and the need for revenge was sizable. Sadly, many of the people executed were not even guilty of the offenses with which they had been charged, or their crimes were certainly not enough to warrant such a punishment. One of the most renowned lynchings during this time period was that of Henry Smith in 1893. Smith was an ex-slave living in Texas when he was accused of the assassinate of a 3-year-old white girl, the daughter of a policeman. Though his role in the child’s assassinate was not obvious, there would be no trial for Smith; once he was found, he would be forced to endure one of the most horrific acts of torture recorded in American history. Before of a crowd of 10,000 people fervent to spy Smith suffer, he was tortured relentlessly before being burned alive. With his body unimaginative on the ground, the crowd cheered their joy at justice having been served.

The work of Pinkerton detectives – The Pinkerton National Detective Agency provided another means to bring criminals to justice. Founded in 1850, the Pinkertons, as the detectives were known, managed to track hundreds of criminals to sight justice served, including Jesse James, Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, and the Irish Molly Maguires. At one time the agency employed more agents than the U.S. Army had soldiers, and it had more mug shots than any other law enforcement agency in the country. Besides their splendid detective skills, the Pinkertons were also famous for their diligence in tracking and capturing known criminals, even following some across the several states. The detectives worked hard to glimpse justice served, and it paid off. Though the agency no longer exists today as it did then, it is remembered as a successful law enforcement group that worked tirelessly to defend the rights and freedoms of law-abiding citizens and give criminals their due.

The assassinate trial of Octavius Barron – When Octavius Barron murdered William Lyman in 1837, he was granted a delicate trial by the public in Rochester, unusual York. On the night of October 20, 18-year-old Barron pointed his pistol at the befriend of Lyman’s head and fired at point blank range. It didn’t peculiar long for authorities to fraction together what Barron had done; with his inaugurate bragging of the crime, his reputation as a less than reliable citizen, and even scrutinize seek accounts, police officers were like a flash to catch and arrest the young man. Charged with slay, Barron faced a trial that was scheduled to start on May 28, 1838. Though it lasted only 10 days, the trial was a spectacle to leer for the citizens of Rochester, who packed the courthouse daily. involved to hear all the details, jurors, attorneys, court employees, and the public listened intently to hours of argument from both the prosecution and the defense. All the while, Barron maintained his plea of not guilty. The jury spent only 15 minutes deciding the young man’s fate; he was guilty with a sentence to die. After his execution on July 25, 1838, the majority idea was that justice had been served – a life for a life.

But the end of Octavius Barron and William Lyman doesn’t demolish there. You can learn more about the men, the destroy, and the meaning of redemption with “Visions: correct Stories of the Supernatural,” a documentary by Ad-Hoc Productions. Learn more about this racy finish at

Has Justices Blindfold Slipped?

Being concerned about something is section of everyday life, however that does not mean judge is always a healthy thing. For example the father who is concerned about his son being bullied is one thing, the father who is concerned about his son being bullied, yet primarily concerns himself with the bully, is quite another.

In being concerned primarily about his son’s state the father is demonstrating a obvious preference for his son’s well-being, whilst in being concerned about his son’s bully, the father’s preference seems to be shifting away from his son.

This leaves the son perilous and hideous as to who is more essential to his father, him or his bully.If we replace the characters in the above example with The Justice System, The Victim and The Criminal, we can discover how the family spot can replicate itself in society.

If a victim goes through The Justice System and feels the criminal received more believe and interest from those in the system than she herself did, then like the son being bullied, she could discern that the preference for focus lies on the criminal, rather than her.This discernment of a preference for criminal focus over victim focus is well known to those dealing with the crime of rape, especially against women. Historically, the victim of rape has frequently near through the system and been left feeling that Justice preferred the criminal to her.

And the Media seems to collaborate in this dynamic. It is approved for them to characterize that Mr X walked free or was given Y years in jail, or a suspended-sentence. But it is less celebrated for them to describe that Ms Z was given reassurance that she would be allowed state-funded access to counselling, medical support, financial reimbursement for vital time taken off of work or other duties, compensation for society’s ineffectiveness in protecting her etc etc.

When we add this personal discernment of a preference for criminal focus over victim focus within the victim to the apparent Media bias towards reporting the fate of the criminal and what was said in relation to him, it is difficult to argue against the assertion that Justice is not so noteworthy blind as mis-focused. And if Justice is mis-focused then we are all subject to discerning her preference, seemingly for those who afflict than those who don’t.

There is a titanic assume in all of this. It is simply this. If we discern preference of focus for criminals and antagonists over us, we might also discern ourselves as the lesser preference. And like the son who discerns his father’s preference shifting away from him, we might be left hazardous and ugly as to who is more necessary to Justice, Us or those who pain us. Uncertainty and discomfort are potentially hazardous fuels.

It seems that if any of the above is proper, then it is time for us to resolve whether or not to possess Justice is blind, or point out that her blind-fold has slipped and that she requires it to be readjusted. And for that, we are responsible.Our antagonists are quite cheerful to behold Justice’s Blindfold has slipped, so are unlikely to point it out. It is we who must befriend to her attire.